Archive for the 'Carriers' Category

Observations: Carriers - April 20, 2010

Tuesday, April 20th, 2010

Standard disclaimer: don’t take from my selections, ordering, headlines, etc. any indications of the interests or plans of my employer (if you do, you’ll undoubtedly be disappointed when they don’t play out.)

Observations: Carriers - April 8, 2010

Thursday, April 8th, 2010

Standard disclaimer: don’t take from my selections, ordering, headlines, etc. any indications of the interests or plans of my employer (if you do, you’ll undoubtedly be disappointed when they don’t play out.)

Observations: Carriers - March 25, 2010

Thursday, March 25th, 2010

Standard disclaimer: don’t take from my selections, ordering, headlines, etc. any indications of the interests or plans of my employer (if you do, you’ll undoubtedly be disappointed when they don’t play out.)

Observations: Carriers - February 22, 2010

Monday, February 22nd, 2010

Standard disclaimer: don’t take from my selections, ordering, headlines, etc. any indications of the interests or plans of my employer (if you do, you’ll undoubtedly be disappointed when they don’t play out.)

Observations: Carriers - February 9, 2010

Tuesday, February 9th, 2010

Standard disclaimer: don’t take from my selections, ordering, headlines, etc. any indications of the interests or plans of my employer (if you do, you’ll undoubtedly be disappointed when they don’t play out.)

Why would anyone buy standalone 3G?

Friday, January 29th, 2010

I think I may have mentioned this before, but it still continues to puzzle me, so I thought it deserved its own post. Feel free to post a comment if you can help me figure this one out.

At the CES show earlier this month, Sprint dropped the pricing on dual mode 3G/4G plans to be the same as the price that everyone charges for just 3G ($59.99/month).

So, given:

  • With a 3G/4G plan, if you’re in the 10% of the country where Sprint has 4G, you get average download speeds of 3-6Mbps (where 3G has average download speeds near 1Mbps).
  • If you’re in that 10% of the country, you get truly unlimited usage - no cap. (All 3G plans from all carriers have a cap - best case at 5GB/month.)
  • (By the end of the year, that 10% will grow to be about a third of the country.)
  • If you aren’t in an area where Sprint has 4G, you almost definitely are where Sprint has 3G. Sprint’s 3G network covers about 5x as much territory as AT&T’s 3G network and is about the same coverage as Verizon.
  • In Sprint’s 3G territory, you get what Gizmodo found to be the fastest download speeds of any 3G network. (Although, you still have the same 5GB/month cap in 3G territories that you’d get on any 3G-only plan.)
  • (And if you work for a large business, you probably already know how well Sprint treats it’s customers.)

So - back to my question - why would anyone buy standalone 3G, when they can get all the benefits of 3G, plus the extra benefits of 4G in a growing slice of the country, all for the same price?

Observations: Carriers - January 15, 2010

Friday, January 15th, 2010

Standard disclaimer: don’t take from my selections, ordering, headlines, etc. any indications of the interests or plans of my employer (if you do, you’ll undoubtedly be disappointed when they don’t play out.)

Observations: Carriers - December 11, 2009

Friday, December 11th, 2009

Standard disclaimer: don’t take from my selections, ordering, headlines, etc. any indications of the interests or plans of my employer (if you do, you’ll undoubtedly be disappointed when they don’t play out.)

Observations: Carriers - November 17, 2009

Tuesday, November 17th, 2009

Standard disclaimer: don’t take from my selections, ordering, headlines, etc. any indications of the interests or plans of my employer (if you do, you’ll undoubtedly be disappointed when they don’t play out.)

Carrier Speed vs. Valley Speed

Friday, November 13th, 2009

Last week, I participated in the Open Mobile Summit in San Francisco. It was a very impressive event. My favorite session was probably the keynote panel on day 2 with Walt Mossberg (The Wall Street Journal) moderating (sort of), John Donovan (AT&T), Kevin Lynch (Adobe), Michael Abbott (Palm), and Vint Cerf (Google). It was a great demonstration of “Big Bell Dogma” vs. Internet innovation.

My panel was the “Fireside chat: Future of the carrier deck.” Again, I think the contrasts in perspective and approach were pretty apparent.

For my intro, I explained that I think there are three fundamental truths that shape how we’re thinking about the deck and app stores:

  1. Customers just want to do what they want to do, when they want and where they want. We need to let that happen.
  2. App developers just want to get their great ideas to market as fast as possible. Carriers can’t figure out what will succeed and what won’t, we need to let the market decide.
  3. However, mobile operators still hold a unique place in the ecosystem. We can take steps that create value for customers and developers.

With those truths in mind, we’re focused on what one of my teammates (Brian Huey) phrased as “Do you want innovation to happen at carrier speed or valley speed?” We want it to happen at valley speed, which means that the carriers need to stop being a chokepoint and instead focus on how to add value without slowing down the process of bringing innovation to market. We don’t add value by trying to determine which apps are worthy of appearing in our “stores.” We do add some value by allowing customers to choose to pay for apps and content through their wireless bill. We do add some value by helping with marketing so that customers don’t have to wade through an endless supply of similar apps. We really add value when we open up our assets (network, location, etc.) so that developers can expand their creative limits.

Carriers are great at operating network assets, and we manage an existing relationship with the end customer. We aren’t great at writing consumer software or developing consumer-facing interfaces. In those areas, we need to get out of the way and let the highly capable players (startups and established players) who specialize in those areas to do what they’re great at. (Needless to say, not all carriers share this perspective.)

In the spirit of getting out of the way, the week before OMS, at our developers conference Sprint announced three pretty significant changes in how we view the carrier deck and app stores:

  1. We don’t believe that carriers are the best at operating app stores. Since Palm’s App Catalog and the Android Market are both well designed app stores, we’ve never included our carrier deck on the Palm Pre (and soon Pixi) nor on any of the Android devices we’ve launched - and we never will. However, as Microsoft’s Windows Marketplace and RIM’s Blackberry App World are establishing similar credibility, we will be removing our deck from Windows Mobile and Blackberry devices. There’s no need to confuse customers with multiple ways to get apps and there’s no need to force developers to submit to multiple stores.
  2. Similarly, feature phone users (those that don’t have a smartphone like Android, Palm, or Blackberry) still need an easy way to find, buy, and download apps and content. This is where the carrier deck still makes sense. But we don’t believe that the carrier is the best to run this app store, nor to figure out where it can go in the future. So, we are issuing an RFP to outsource the operation of our deck to someone who specializes in app stores, can do it faster and better for developers and customers, and can take it all to the next level.
  3. We also know that there are already lots of applications out there that haven’t bothered fighting through the gauntlet of carrier approvals. Instead, they’re distributing their apps through independent mobile app stores. Probably the best of these (at least the most successful) is GetJar. At our developer conference we also announced that we’re opening up our deck so that when our customers search in our deck, they’ll also be able to find and download everything that’s in GetJar.

I’d love to hear what you think? Is Sprint heading in the right direction, or should carriers continue to insert themselves more in the process? Please leave your comments below.