Archive for the 'Business Models' Category

Business Observations: July 16, 2008 Edition

Wednesday, July 16th, 2008

I was chatting with Om Malik last week and he commented about this blog: “You don’t use many words.”  He phrased it as a positive observation, but it made me realize how little I’ve actually been writing lately and how much I’ve just been providing lists of links.

So… Here’s an attempt to provide a little more commentary/perspective around the list of links.  It’s still not as time consuming as starting from scratch, but let me know if my added comments are really adding any value.


Standard disclaimer: don’t take from my selections, ordering, headlines, etc. any indications of the interests or plans of my employer (if you do, you’ll undoubtedly be disappointed when they don’t play out.)

Of course the big news of the past week or so was the release of the 3G iPhone.  This sparked tremendous commentary, most of it not particularly insightful for folks like us looking to make money in mobility, but there were some ponies in there.

Michael Mace always has interesting things to say.  Here’s the heart of his recommendations to those trying to market their products in a post-iPhone world: “If anyone from RIM is reading this, please listen to me closely. I beg of you, don’t be chumps. You’re Canadian, for God’s sake. You don’t do sexy. You do humble and inoffensive. … If you try to imitate him [Steve Jobs], you’re going to look like mom and dad pogo-dancing when Rock Lobster comes on at a wedding reception. Not pretty. Not pretty at all.”  He then goes on to extend the advice to Microsoft.  Good stuff. 

Om himself naturally weighed in on the impact Apple’s new device is having on how mobility factors into life.  I think his observations are good news for the industry and provide pointers to all of us planning to participate in mobile broadband growth: “The 3G speed is quite addictive and it doesn’t take long to slowly start switching your daily compute tasks to this device instead of reaching for your computer.  A lot of that is because the iPhone has a generous screen and is very easy to use, but more importantly it has a more than adequate browser, making it an ideal candidate for being a ’cloud client.’ All that was missing was a fast-enough connection that helped ‘off-source’ some (or, in the case of others, many) tasks from their computers.”

Paul Golding focused on the App Store within iTunes and the impact that the iPhone SDK was having on mobile applications.  He made two key observations that I believe are meaningful to market opportunities within the mobile ecosystem.  “1. Many of the iPhone apps are photo and location enabled, even for services that didn’t previously have an overt location or photo attribute. Why? Just because it’s there and it’s easy to do. This is fantastic and is exactly how the mobile ecosystem should work. … 2. Many of the Web 2.0 browser-only services out there have opted to develop a native iPhone app.”  His first observation really points to the things that make Mobility unique and what new things are enabled by mobility that previously were really hard or impossible.  I plan to write more on this soon.  His second point certainly adds fuel to the “native app” vs. “web-based app” debate.  Any application developers would do well to ponder the implications of Paul’s observations on emerging market opportunities…

Of course, not everyone was buying all the Apple hype. 

Carlo Longino commented on Apple’s hype around selling 1 million iPhones over a weekend: “Just to let reality back in for a second… Nokia Q1 sales: 115.5 million (from Nokia PR), or roughly 1.28 million per day.”

David Cushman used Apple’s challenges with the new phone launch to teach all of us in the industry a lesson: “The myth of Apple = everything working beautifully, was soundly debunked on 3G Iphone Friday. … I’m picking on Apple for a reason. They are among the very best at delivering delightful user experiences.  … And yet Apple still gives us iphone Friday.  There is headroom for better. Much better.  And it’s worth going after. There is a large and cash-rich segment of the world’s population who are not geeks, not prepared to fiddle, not prepared to kill two-three hours of their lives upgrading with new software, not prepared to learn their way around…”  We have to make mobility simple, instant, and compelling for techno-geeks and non-techno-geeks alike!

Barbara Ballard similarly used the iPhone user interface to encourage all of us to strive for even greater simplicity and usability.  “I strongly support simplicity in mobile design, but done intelligently. … When is simplicity not good? When it blocks significant numbers of users from achieving regular goals.”  Barbara gives specific examples of the good and bad.  Her insights here and elsewhere are well worth reading for anyone designing products for mobile devices.

But not all comments this past week were tied directly to the iPhone. 

Dean Bubley commented on the hype surrounding mobile broadband (probably a byproduct of iPhone hype).  Dean holds firmly to a handful of beliefs about the industry, and this is one of them, so he couldn’t leave the topic alone.  Agree or not with him, but read him and consider how his comments may impact your business model.  “In other words, there is what Boris Johnson might refer to as an ‘inverted pyramid of piffle‘ when it comes to discussion about mobile broadband. A few % of the users generate a huge % of the traffic, while a large chunk of supposed users (ie people with suitable phones & networks) generate none at all. This will change only slowly, as PC-based mobile broadband is still early in its growth cycle, while 3G is being pushed into handsets of people who still don’t care about anything more than voice & SMS.”

I’m sure Dean also has opinions on the EU-funded SPICE initiative.  Someday maybe he’ll share them with me.  In the meantime, we have this report on the “universal architecture for advanced communications services” that researchers are developing.  Of course, similar goals have been pursued in the past - the efforts certainly help us envision different futures, even if we never fully realize them…

On a more positive note, two U.S. Senators have proposed the Mobile Wireless Tax Fairness Act of 2008.  This bill recognizes the Big Bell Dogma efforts to slow mobile adoption through burdensome taxation.  Internet tax moratoriums have been successful in enabling continued Internet growth, I’m hopeful that we can similarly see continued mobility growth and see an end to unfair taxation and regulatory burdens on the industry.

Business Observations: July 11, 2008 Edition

Friday, July 11th, 2008

As the Mobility Era matures, obviously a key question will be “how to make money?”. There are plenty of opinions on the best answer to this question. The below is very inclusive and I provide no editorial functions, so don’t take from my selections, ordering, headlines, etc. any indications of the interests or plans of my employer (if you do, you’ll undoubtedly be disappointed when they don’t play out):

—————-
Now playing: Ben Shive - The Old Man

Business Observations: July 1, 2008 Edition

Tuesday, July 1st, 2008

As the Mobility Era matures, obviously a key question will be “how to make money?”. There are plenty of opinions on the best answer to this question. The below is very inclusive and I provide no editorial functions, so don’t take from my selections, ordering, headlines, etc. any indications of the interests or plans of my employer (if you do, you’ll undoubtedly be disappointed when they don’t play out):

—————-
Now playing: Ben Shive - Rise Up

Business Observations: June 23, 2008 Edition

Monday, June 23rd, 2008

As the Mobility Era matures, obviously a key question will be “how to make money?”. There are plenty of opinions on the best answer to this question. The below is very inclusive and I provide no editorial functions, so don’t take from my selections, ordering, headlines, etc. any indications of the interests or plans of my employer (if you do, you’ll undoubtedly be disappointed when they don’t play out):

—————-
Now playing: Tenth Avenue North - By Your Side

Business Observations: June 2, 2008 Edition

Monday, June 2nd, 2008

As the Mobility Era matures, obviously a key question will be “how to make money?”. There are plenty of opinions on the best answer to this question. The below is very inclusive and I provide no editorial functions, so don’t take from my selections, ordering, headlines, etc. any indications of the interests or plans of my employer (if you do, you’ll undoubtedly be disappointed when they don’t play out):

—————-
Now playing: Bebo Norman - Into The Day

Business Observations: May 12, 2008 Edition

Monday, May 12th, 2008

Update: Since I’ve broken my schedule for weekly posts, I might as well break my schedule for monthly posts.  From now on, I’ll be providing updates as I collect a readable collection. Today, it’s all about business observations (previously called “business models” but it was always more than just that…).

As the Mobility Era matures, obviously a key question will be “how to make money?”. There are plenty of opinions on the best answer to this question. The below is very inclusive and I provide no editorial functions, so don’t take from my selections, ordering, headlines, etc. any indications of the interests or plans of my employer (if you do, you’ll undoubtedly be disappointed when they don’t play out):

—————-
Now playing: Mark Heard - When His Luck Runs Out

Why the New Clearwire Makes Sense

Wednesday, May 7th, 2008

Back in July 2007, Sprint announced deals with Google and Clearwire. At the time, I sang the praises of the two agreements. Today, the three companies, together with three cable providers and Intel, announced a much more far-reaching relationship.

The July Clearwire announcement was about network sharing. Sprint would build a 4th generation wireless WiMax network covering part of the country. Clearwire would build a WiMax network covering the rest of the country. And then each company’s customers could roam onto the other’s network when traveling. At the time, I called out the single most significant benefit of the arrangement as: “By splitting the country and agreeing who will build where, capital and time aren’t wasted building networks that compete with each other in popular geographies. The full capital plans of each company can be working together to accelerate and broaden availability faster and farther than either company could achieve on its own.”

Today’s announcement goes even further, merging the WiMax operations of Sprint with Clearwire to create a new independent company, under the Clearwire brand, but 51% owned by Sprint. The benefits I previously called out still hold true: more efficient capital spend, more efficient communication of the value proposition, and a stronger position with technology vendors.

However, the inclusion of the cable companies takes it another step further. As you may recall, a consortium called SpectrumCo, led by Comcast, acquired 137 licenses in the AWS auction back in 2006. Although these cable companies could credibly have built their own network, instead investing in the new Clearwire is a much better way to get what they want with the most efficient use of capital.

For Clearwire and Sprint, of course, the cable companies represent a tremendous sales channel. The wholesale agreements with the cable companies appear to be well suited to integration into convergence bundles that could help rapidly drive broad adoption of WiMax.

Comcast’s CEO, Brian Roberts said “This transaction is attractive to us strategically and financially and puts in place very attractive wholesale relationships for access to Sprint’s existing 3G and Clearwire’s 4G networks, giving us complete flexibility to introduce wireless mobility in terms of product innovation and deployment.”

Similarly, Glenn Britt, Time Warner Cable’s CEO said “”This exciting new venture enables Time Warner Cable to help shape the next generation of wireless services in ways that will complement and enhance our products and services.”

So, best of all worlds, we don’t have mad capital being thrown at building competing networks, instead we have tremendous marketing power being focused to drive utilization scale for an asset intensive business.

But what about Google?

Last July, I noted: “But Sprint’s commitment to open APIs for developers like Google to innovate on top of the Sprint (and Clearwire) networks is even better. We have a sense that increased availability (because products and services are fully useful wherever you go) and contextual relevance (because they will adapt to the context in which you’re using them - where, when, with whom, etc.) is what will drive new value in the Mobility Revolution. But, we can only guess at how that new value will actually be realized. Only by putting this power into the hands of innovators will the full potential of mobility be realized. … Sprint and Google both, in this announcement, are clearly signaling their commitment to enabling the kind of innovation that can truly revolutionize how we interact with the world, how we do our jobs, and how we run our businesses.”

Google seems to agree and has put a sizeable investment behind this belief. On the official Google blog, Larry Adler wrote: “We believe that the new network will provide wireless consumers with real choices for the software applications, content and handsets that they desire. Such freedom will mirror the openness principles underlying the Internet and enable users to get the most out of their wireless broadband experience. As we’ve supported open standards for spectrum and wireless handsets, we’re especially excited that Clearwire intends to build and maintain a network that will embrace important openness features. In particular, the network will: (1) expand advanced high speed wireless Internet access in the U.S., (2) allow consumers to utilize any lawful applications, content and devices without blocking, degrading or impairing Internet traffic and (3) engage in reasonable and competitively-neutral network management.”

The Clearwire deal is well aligned with complementary Sprint announcements over the past couple of days that also drive freedom for users and innovation by third parties.

Today, Google and Sprint also announced partnering on the 3G network that Sprint will continue to own and operate. Kevin Packingham, Sprint’s VP of Product Managment said “Our partnership with Google is a great example of how Sprint is making the mobile Internet experience even more customer-friendly and useful to our customers.” And Doug Garland, Google’s VP of Product Management noted “We both believe in openness and providing compelling, easy-to-use mobile services that consumers can use every day. We look forward to working together to deliver a great experience.”

Sprint also amplified that commitment to freedom (that’s freedom as in “free speech” not “free beer”) at the JavaOne conference this week. Sprint announced, among other things, a relaunch of the Professional Developers’ Program, providing APIs for developers to access GPS, address book, and messaging information.

Bottom line, what does it all mean?

I believe these announcements provide a much more rapid path to a broadband mobile (not just wireless) network that delivers multi-megabit speeds and the openness to innovation that will unleash unimaginable developments. But it also means marketing partners that share the vision and can drive this mobility revolution to the mass market.

And that really makes sense for driving the mobility revolution forward!

—————-
Now playing: Phil Keaggy - Water Day

Spot Off

Monday, April 28th, 2008

Way back in October of 2006 I commented on my decision first to not renew my MSN Direct subscription for my SPOT watch, and second to not trade up to a new 2nd generation SPOT watch. As I noted at the time, the SPOT model was challenged by betting on the watch and by betting against cellular data models.

Apparently I wasn’t alone.

Microsoft has announced that they are discontinuing the SPOT watch program. Michael Mace has an excellent write-up on the whole SPOT story at Mobile Opportunity. It’s worth checking out.

—————-
Now playing: Fighting Instinct - Back To You [Acoustic]

Business Models: April 2008

Saturday, April 26th, 2008

As the Mobility Era matures, obviously a key question will be “how to make money?”. There are plenty of opinions on the best answer to this question. The below is very inclusive and I provide no editorial functions, so don’t take from my selections, ordering, headlines, etc. any indications of the interests or plans of my employer (if you do, you’ll undoubtedly be disappointed when they don’t play out):

—————-
Now playing: Phil Keaggy - The Blue Trail

Business Models: March 2008

Friday, March 28th, 2008

As the Mobility Era matures, obviously a key question will be “how to make money?”. There are plenty of opinions on the best answer to this question. The below is very inclusive and I provide no editorial functions, so don’t take from my selections, ordering, headlines, etc. any indications of the interests or plans of my employer (if you do, you’ll undoubtedly be disappointed when they don’t play out):

—————-
Now playing: Phil Keaggy - Water Day