It’s been a long time since I last posted. I’m also very behind in responding to comments, I apologize for that and hope to get caught up in the next few days. Between a lengthy overseas vacation and a full plate of work, it’s been hard to carve out time for this blog.
But, there are a few news items that are worth commenting on.
The first few items point to Sprint’s commitment to continuing to accelerate the Mobility Revolution. This shows up in a number of ways - Sprint has been scoring well in RootMetric’s network comparison tests demonstrating our commitment to the network investments that are necessary to support the Mobility Revolution.
According to Chitika, we’ve also been increasing our share of the Android market (see graph below). Note that Android sales from our prepaid brands (Virgin and Boost both have Android handsets that are selling well) are not included in Sprint’s numbers and probably are a meaningful part of the growth in “other”. This demonstrates our commitment to the open development environment which is key to customers integrating mobility into all aspects of their lives.
This commitment to the network and platforms necessary for the Mobility Revolution is reflected in how our customers use their devices. According to a Consumer Reports study, Sprint’s smartphone customers use about twice as much data as our competitors’ customers - proving the point that Sprint’s customers are way out ahead in the Mobility Revolution - making mobility integral to everything they do.
The final news item I can’t pass without commenting on is Google’s proposed acquisition of Motorola. This deal is a clear demonstration of the Mobility Revolution in action. Google, perhaps the most powerful company on the planet, has put their money where their mouth is. For a couple of years Google has been saying that mobility is their top priority and now they are proving it. As with any big deal, this one’s not a simple black and white, good or bad news story. I think I can best address it in terms of what’s good, what’s bad, and what’s ugly about the potential tie up.
- Google gains Motorola’s patents, which help in the patent wars in which Big Bell Dogmatists have been trying to slow down the Mobility Revolution by impeding Android-based innovation.
- Google gains a better appreciation of the complexities OEMs face in building Android handsets, likely leading to improvements in the operating system.
- Google likely gains traction with Google TV through Motorola’s Set Top Box business, potentially bringing additional value to the Android ecosystem and encouraging some pretty interesting cross-platform innovation (imagine a Netflix or Hulu app with your smartphone as remote control and the STB as video player).
- Motorola’s strength in low-cost feature phones may provide Google with insights into how to expand the Android ecosystem into emerging markets.
- Motorola is obviously a strong competitor to Google’s other Android OEM partners. Samsung, LG, HTC, and others are likely to pause and consider their level of commitment to Android going forward.
- Google gains leverage in the Android and overall mobile ecosystem, making all other players work harder to earn their fair share of industry profits.
- The deal will require regulatory approval, which will take months, potentially slowing down innovation at Motorola, Google, and other ecosystem players.
- Google has to convince everyone that they won’t unfairly favor Motorola over other handset OEMs.
- RIM, Microsoft, and Nokia are all in unstable positions in the mobile industry. Microsoft potentially has the opportunity to win the hearts of Motorola’s competitors, but if they fail to do so, they may find themselves with an unsustainable market position. Microsoft may also succumb to the urge to keep pace with Google by acquiring Nokia or RIM. And RIM’s only hope (other than being bought) is if enough of the ecosystem shifts from Android to Windows to keep RIM within sight of the pack.
What do you think - did I miss anything?