Can MID overcome the Origami challenges?
Intel introduced a new Linux-based ultra-mobile PC form factor at a conference in Beijing last month. MobileLinuxInfo has a nice video showing the user interface, which, admittedly, is pretty cool.
But, does this new class of device overcome the challenges associated with the UMPC?
Back in December, I identified a list of things that a successful ultra-mobile computer would need to achieve:
Well, if we think about it, the UMPC obviously falls between a laptop (or tablet) computer and a Windows Mobile device. For the UMPC to be a hit, it will need to combine the computing power of the laptop with the mobility power of the Pocket PC.
What does that look like?
A laptop (or tablet) has more computing power than a mobile device because:
- It runs “real” Windows and supports the seemingly infinite array of Windows-based apps.
- It is very usable, with reasonable input, meaningful screen real estate for output, and a big enough screen to comfortably read.
- Our price/performance expectations have been effectively managed by manufacturers.
A Windows Mobile device has more mobility power than a laptop because:
- It’s small enough to conveniently take with you everywhere (high availability).
- It’s likely that you’ll want to use it anywhere, anytime, so you DO take it with you. (Unlike, for example, your digital camera.)
- Mobile devices are always connected, so their value is multiplied by what’s available across the network.
- They are becoming increasingly aware of their context (location, proximity, presence, network strength, relevant data such as traffic and weather, etc.) enabling their value to increase exponentially as the context drives increased relevance to where I am, what I’m doing, who I’m with, what situation I’m in, etc.
- Battery life lasts for hours of use and days of non-use standby.
- Pricing is generally less than $500, making a mobile device an affordable investment.
Does the MID meet these requirements?
In a word: No.
The MID has two things going for it: It runs a version of Linux (specifically the version endorsed by the Chinese government, thus the introduction of the devices in China), and it has a better user interface than Windows.
I’m guessing it will also have a lower price than the original UMPCs, will likely have better battery life, will likely have better connectivity, and will boot faster. That’s all good. But, as described, the device lacks enough of the advantages of a “real” laptop and of a cellphone that I doubt it will have any meaningful impact on the market.
I’m still waiting.